Author Archives: tinker1066

Savage Love: The Sequel

Worked on the rifle yesterday afternoon and progress has been very good indeed.  First some pictures of it’s state at the beginning…

The bolt has just begun to budge here.

Gently tapping the lever with a soft hammer actually got the bolt moving. Lots of WD40 and gently tapping continued to yield results. Eventually I was able to get the action completely open, and removed the bolt.

Just starting to move.
…and the bolt is out. There’s a small plate at the back of the receiver on the left secured by a screw. This limits the backward movement of the bolt. Remove it and the bolt comes right out.

Ugly though it may be, everything works. I did some initial clean-up on the bolt, and after re-assembly I can cycle the action by hand.  Next I broke out the vintage .30 rifle-cleaning kit that I inherited from my Uncle Jim, grabbed the Hoppe’s #9 and a good stiff brush and went after the bore. You can see the first patch after it’s pass through the bore in the photo below.

The Outers rifle cleaning kit seems virtually un-used; given the state of Uncle Jim’s rifle when I also inherited it I’m not surprised. Not that the bore of that gun was bad, but I’m pretty sure he fired the rifle once, cleaned it and it sat for the next four decades…
That is a seriously ugly patch, and that ain’t the worst of it; it pushed a bunch of crud out ahead of it too!

Muhgawd, I’ve seen old black-powder guns that weren’t this filthy!  I kept after it, using #9 and them gun oil, and after a couple dozen patches they finally started to come out clean. With some trepidation I stuck a flashlight up to the breach and peered down the bore… the shiny, shiny bore. I could hardly believe it. Given the state of the outside of the barrel I had assumed a full replacement would be needed, but if I knew the caliber and had the right bolt to mount the stock I could actually fire the gun at this point.

Yeah, about that… in 1954 the Model 99 was offered several .30-caliber cartridges: .30-30, .300 Savage and the then-new hotness, .308 Winchester. After looking at the chamber I thought about it, dug up a .308 and dropped it in and it fit perfectly. Neither of the other .30-caliber chamberings will allow a .308 to fit. Investigating further the cartridge fit in the magazine and cycled perfectly. I’ll be dipped…

After examining the stock I determined that the ‘cracks’ are de-laminations of the grain caused by excessive drying, and are in a place where they are not structural. In other words they can be repaired. I’ll need to make a new, matching forearm but basically that’s it.  It works… now the challenge is making it pretty. I’m up for that; it’s essentially grunt-work, and I’m well familiar with it. The only concern is the pitting on the outside of last 10″ of barrel- it’s bad. I’m a bit concerned that the barrel will get thinner than I’d prefer. Not from a structural standpoint, mind you; purely from an aesthetic perspective.  Not to be a cliche, but I might lop a few inches off and take it down to 18-20″. I’ve gotten used to shorter guns, and find that I prefer them in the field. 

I almost regret that the bore is in such good shape (my imagination was running a bit wild with the possibilities) but in the end it’s a good cartridge, it’s easier and it’s cheaper to use the existing barrel so that’s what I’m going to do.  I’m pretty darned jazzed; it means I can get on with the project without worrying about affording and sourcing a new… well, anything significant, really. I’ll still need a screw to retain the fore-stock and a bolt for the stock but that’s pretty trivial.

The bulk of the work needed is cosmetic. While it’s a big job it’s not rocket science; lots of abrasives and elbow grease, but it’s well-trodden territory for me. I’ll get everything cleaned up and rust-blue the receiver and such parts as need it. I’ll repair and refinish the stock and see what I can do to find a reasonably matching piece of wood for the fore-end. I frankly cannot believe how well this is going so far, and I have to say I’m waiting for the other shoe to drop, but so far so good!

Best $50 I’ve spent in a long, long time!

Michael Tinker Pearce, 16 November 2020

If you like what you read here, please consider clicking the link above and supporting me on Patreon

Savage Love!

In the 1980’s I not infrequently borrowed a neighbors Savage Model 99 in .308 for hunting. I always liked it; it was handy, with the mechanism and rotary magazine keeping the weight close to the body. He wouldn’t sell it; mostly an academic consideration since I seldom had any money to spare in those days.

Savage Model 99- the other other levergun.

The basis of the Model 99 was the Model 1892, a cooperative venture between Arthur Savage and Colt. This was submitted to Army trials, but lost to the Krag rifle. On the basis of this design the Savage Arms company was formed, and in 1895 beat out the Winchester 1895 as the official rifle of the New York National Guard. Politics scuttled this contract, but a refined version of the rifle was introduced commercially as the Model 1899, and quickly became popular with big-game hunters in North America.

The Savage 99 did achieve military use; during WW1 it was adopted by the Montreal Home Guard units. It was chambered in .303 Savage; conversion to standard British .303 would have required re-tooling, which would have resulted in necessary delays.

One of the reasons for the popularity of the Model 99 was it’s rotary magazine. This allowed the use of ballistically more efficient pointed or ‘spitzer’ bullets. Most other lever-actions use tubular magazines, and it was thought that the point of a bullet pressed against the primer of the next round in the magazine might lead to disaster if the weapon were dropped.

The gun was available in a wide variety of calibers, with the most popular being .30-30 Winchester and .300 Savage. One proprietary cartridge, the .250-3000 was the first commercial cartridge to exceed 3000 fps. at the muzzle. Later versions chambered the more powerful .308 Winchester, and offered options such as a removable box magazine.

Production was discontinued in 1997, presumably due to increasing production costs. Today these guns command prices starting around $600 and go up from there. In the case of rarer calibers they go up a lot.

I’ve fancied them right the way along, but prices went too high for me to justify on a rifle that duplicated the function of guns I already have. It appeared I was destined to remain frustrated in my desire to own one…

An ‘Affordable’ Model 99

I was at Pinto’s earlier this year (where else?) when a fellow brought in a load of guns to sell, which included the rusted remains of a Model 99. After the shop had procured the lot of guns I expressed an interest in the Savage. The action is frozen by rust, the stock is cracked and there is serious pitting on the outside of the barrel. Chris offered it to me for a pittance, and we agreed to trade it for a bit of fabrication work. That didn’t work out (he couldn’t find the gun that needed the work) so today we paid him the requested pittance and brought the rifle home.

The rifle has Weaver scope mounts and the original flip-up adjustable sight.
It doesn’t get prettier from the top…
The last foot or so of barrel is extremely pitted on the outside.

So, frozen solid by rust, badly pitted on the outside of the barrel and God only knows what the inside looks like, needing a new stock and fore-stock. It appears to be thirty caliber, but which thirty caliber? The gun was made in 1954, so there are several possible choices.

It doesn’t really matter. If, against all odds, the inside of the barrel is OK I’ll do a chamber casting and figure it out. Perhaps that information will be revealed as I clean her up. If I have to replace the barrel, well… we’ll see. I might go with one of the standard calibers or go with something a bit more… exotic. Whatever, I want to refinish the gun to ‘like new’ condition.

Well, first things first, and the first thing is to saturate the action in WD40 for a while and see if I can break it loose. If that doesn’t work there are other options, but I’ll try to keep things simple for the moment.

This is going to be a fun, if complex and probably frustrating, project. I’ll keep you posted as to how it goes.

Michael Tinker Pearce, 13 November 2020

If you like what you read here, please consider clicking the link above and supporting me on Patreon.

Re-Tasking my Old Colt .32-20.

OK, let’s start by saying I don’t cut the barrel off of every revolver that passes through my hands. No, really! I leave the majority of them alone, actually… they’re just generally not interesting enough to merit a blog post.

This Colt PPS .32-20 , also called .32 Winchester Center Fire, was made in 1910. Fitted with antler grips and a Tyler T-grip it was useful for testing loads, and I liked it quite a bit but didn’t really have any use for it once I’d finished testing.

A year or two back I got my hands on an early Colt police Positive Special with a four-inch barrel to use for ballistic testing in the ‘How Obsolete Are They?’ series, and it’s a nice old gun. Not the best-ever trigger, not in ‘collectible’ condition, but a nice. I made some stag grips for it because the grips that came on the gun were crappy home-made units, and I like stag grips. I used the gun for my tests, then stuck it in a drawer in my safe.

I like the gun but I haven’t really got a use for a medium-frame 4″ revolver. In recent years I have been trying not to hang on to guns I don’t shoot, with a few exceptions that have historic or sentimental value. While this was my first .32-20 it really didn’t qualify by that standard. I wasn’t in a hurry to part with it, but I was contemplating doing so at some point.

I’d always thought, for no particular good reason, that it would be neat to have a Colt Detective Special in .32-20, and had idly contemplated buying a .32-20 cylinder and fitting it to mine. I never got around to it, mostly because I was reluctant to mess with my DS; it’s a very nice gun and an excellent shooter.

My Colt Detective Special in .32 S&W Long, made in 1949. OK, they call it .32 Colt New Police, but it’s just a S&W long with a flat-point bullet. Did i mention I like stag grips? Fantastic shooting gun, and in standard reloads .32-20 offers little or no ballistic advantage over .32 CNP/S&W long so there seemed little point in converting it.

Traditionally on Veteran’s day Linda has decreed that I must do something fun, ideally just for me. I know Veteran’s day is two days away but looking at the week’s schedule I decided to celebrate it today, and casting about for a fun thing to do I decided that rather than selling the Colt PPS I would modify it to fulfill my hankering to a .32-20 Detective Special. It wouldn’t actually be one, of course, but it would be fun and the end result would be the next best thing.

First things first things first, shortening the barrel. I’m a metalworker by trade, so it’s not rocket science for me. I carefully marked the barrel at a hair over 2″ and cut it on my band-saw. Then I trued it up on my belt-grinder, making sure it was nice and square. I used a tapered pipe-chamfering bit in my drill-press to cut a new crown in the muzzle. I cleaned up the crown, sanded and polished the muzzle and cold-blued it with Van’s Instant blue.

I made the sight out of some 0.100″ O-1 tool-steel, cutting it to shape. I used a cut-off wheel to cut a slot in the back of the sight. I used the cut-off wheel again to put a slot in the top of the barrel, filled it with solder flux and inserted the sight. I mounted the gun in a bench-vise, carefully heated the sight and barrel then soldered the sight in with silver-bearing plumbing solder. After it cooled I wiped everything down with acetone to remover residue from the flux. I cleaned it up with files and sandpaper then finished it with more Van’s. This done I filled the slot with orange-red enamel.

The slot in the sight provides space for the enamel, and protects it from wear. It also prevents the colored sight from ‘fuzzing out’ in bright overhead light.

I didn’t want to cut away the front of the trigger-guard like a ‘Fitz-‘ modified gun, but It is nice to have better, faster access to the trigger on a carry-revolver. I used a 5/8″ contact-wheel on my belt-grinder to remove material on the front of the trigger-guard on the right side, then hand-sanded and polished the are and finished it with Van’s.

Cutting away the front side of the trigger-guard on the right allows easier, faster access to the trigger without significantly compromising safety.

At some point I suppose I should do a walk-through of a trigger job, but that’s a post of its own. Suffice to say I made things smoother and the trigger is better. I didn’t change or modify and springs; the trigger isn’t lighter. It’s just smoother, which to my way of thinking is what it really needed to be.

With the grips installed that pretty much finishes things off. The gun is now compact and handy, and limited test-firing at five yards produced a ragged one-hole group. I need to get to the range and really wring it out, but all indications are good.

A Bit About .32-20

It seems strange to me, but a lot of people these days are unfamiliar with this cartridge, so here’s a bit of history.

.32-20, also called .32 WCF (Winchester center Fire) started out chambered in the Winchester Model 1873 rifle, and was first offered in 1882. It was intended primarily for small game, varmints and even game as large as small deer. Colt later chambered their 1873 Single Action Army in this caliber, and both S&W, Colt and others introduced double action revolvers in .32-20 by the end of the 19th C.

In the 1890s with the transition to smokeless powder, and stronger rifles to accommodate it, the cartridge gained significantly in power. This posed a bit of an issue when these cartridges were used in older, weaker revolvers. because of this when SAAMI standards were imposed they limited the maximum pressure to 16000 PSI, and modern factory loads conform to this. Rifle loads often go as high as 40,000 PSI, meaning one needs to pay attention to whether load data is intended for rifles or handguns. There are a few handguns like the Thompson Contender or Ruger Blackhawk can handle rifle loads, but they are the exception rather than the rule. Fired from a 20-24″ barrel these loads offer power levels comparable to .44 Magnum, and many deer have fallen to them over the decades.

As a revolver cartridge fired from a 4-6″ barrel typical loads use bullets from 85-115grs. at velocities ranging from 800-1100 fps. Muzzle energy levels range from from 150-250 ft.lbs.. This places it in a category comparable to standard-pressure .38 Special loads.

The load I developed for this gun uses a 90gr. reversed-HBWC over 4.9gr. of Power Pistol, with a Federal Magnum Small Pistol primer touching things off. This is listed as making 1087 fps. from a 5.5″ barrel, and out of this gun it achieved a five-shot average of 925 fps. and 170 ft./lbs of muzzle energy, with an extreme spread of 21 fps. This is not a maximum pressure load, but it’s close enough in a 110-year-old pistol.

Wrapping Things Up

I found that, with a bit of convincing, Quikstrips for .327 will hold .32-20 cartridges. I like the gun and it’s a good size for an EDC revolver; if it performs as I expect I’ll make a holster and maybe even carry it. I just like it that much! I’ll follow up when I’ve had a chance to give it a proper try-out at the range.

Michael Tinker Pearce, 10 November 2020

If you like what you read here, please consider clicking the link above and supporting me on Patreon.