So, something in a potent caliber. Something practical, easy to reload, a gun that I shoot well and am comfortable with. Ideally something not too large. “Something semi-automatic,” Linda suggested. “Preferably something we don’t have to buy…” OK, that narrows it down… In the end it came to two choices:
The top gun is a Para-Ordinance LDA .45. The other is Linda’s Kahr E9 (which she loves but never carries.) Both guns are single-stacks with semi-DA triggers. Both are flawlessly reliable and easy to shoot fast and accurately. Their footprints are virtually identical. But for all of their similarity they are very different guns.
The .45 is heavier, but not enough to bother me. It has a shorter, lighter trigger pull and a manual safety. Importantly it has the hard-wired manual-of arms of the 1911. I like the big, soft shove of .45 ACP recoil, and in this gun the combination of the bull-barrel, multi-spring recoil system and the short, high-velocity slide-stroke brings double taps in on target in a way you wouldn’t expect unless you were familiar with Detonics Combatmasters. It only carries 6+1, but a pair of ten-round mags will help that right along.
The Kahr adds two rounds to the .45’s 6+1, and I have no issues with a 9mm with modern defensive ammunition. The sleeker profile allows me to get three fingers on the handle, and the wrap-around rubber grip is very comfortable and secure. The alloy frame makes it noticeably lighter- though the weight is not a deal-breaker. The trigger pull is longer but it’s like a super-light, super-smooth revolver trigger. So much so that double taps are no problem. As familiar as I am with revolvers these days the long reset bothers me not at all. Our spare mags hold 8 and 9 rounds, so the overall count is basically the same.
Both guns have a lot going for them, and I was having a hard time choosing…
“Carry them both,” Linda said.
“That seems a bit excessive,” I said.
“Not at the same time, you muppet! Alternate until you decide.”
Oh. Uh, OK.
Don’t get me wrong- the venerable Smith will remain on pocket-drop duty, and I’ll undoubtedly throw a revolver of one sort or another into the mix now and again as the mood takes me. I expect though that I will find myself carrying one of these guns more than the other and the decision as to my primary EDC will be made.
In the meantime I guess I had better get busy making some holsters and mag-pouches…
Michael Tinker Pearce 4 June 2018
She called you a Muppet! :o)
I think I’d like to try a Kahr.
I think you’d enjoy it. I haven’t shot the composite-framed guns, but this gun has mild recoil for a 9mm its size, great ergonomics and that sweet, sweet trigger. This is the gun that made Linda a trigger-snob.
I have a Kahr CM9. I like the trigger, the sights and the gun shoots well. My issue was that it *really* like to be clean and well lubricated. Anything less than pristine and well oiled and I had reliability issues. Not a good combo for a gun that would be carried in the pocket in the heat and humidity of the Texas Gulf Coast.
Nine times out of ten I have my Ruger LCR or S&W J-Frame in my pocket and two speed strips but on occasion I will go with the Glock 43 and a couple extended magazines instead.
For now, those suffice.
Take care and God bless.
Hard to go wrong with an LCR or J-frame! As it turns out my dlemma was solved by a birthday present from my wife… but more on that later!